Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-16 07:39:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A90DCB7E35430FE8BDAFA286C2EBBF9B12AF258A9D9CE0D37306F3568481AEB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is argumentative, vague, and does not provide info that can not be found in the tweet (visualization clearly starts in 1880). Cites Wikipedia in an attempt to overrule NASA. Tweet is clear, factually correct, contains neither misleading nor exaggerated statements.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691427290452734178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A90DCB7E35430FE8BDAFA286C2EBBF9B12AF258A9D9CE0D37306F3568481AEB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1692171589877
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691427290452734178A90DCB7E35430FE8BDAFA286C2EBBF9B12AF258A9D9CE0D37306F3568481AEB4