Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-06 23:44:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 684E65261B63E8DAB10C28FFE043C033F4BC7F3B3BFD9398678F764A4F9166AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is argumentative, vague, and does not provide info that can not be found in the tweet (visualization clearly starts in 1880). Cites Wikipedia in an attempt to overrule NASA. Tweet is clear, factually correct, contains neither misleading nor exaggerated statements.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691427290452734178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 684E65261B63E8DAB10C28FFE043C033F4BC7F3B3BFD9398678F764A4F9166AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1699314295888
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691427290452734178684E65261B63E8DAB10C28FFE043C033F4BC7F3B3BFD9398678F764A4F9166AD