Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-16 01:16:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7CE7A11FEE0C87F242259D0F553A87AB1F562322EAD8364D4191E55BF2F23F06
Participant Details

Original Note:

The outcome was not in anyway determined by public opinion or social media. It was a civil case in a US court w/ the verdict reached unanimously by a jury, which found Heard liable for deformation with actual malice. That verdict is recorded & stands, regardless of social media.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691259869179813984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7CE7A11FEE0C87F242259D0F553A87AB1F562322EAD8364D4191E55BF2F23F06
  • createdAtMillis - 1692148560797
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16912598691798139847CE7A11FEE0C87F242259D0F553A87AB1F562322EAD8364D4191E55BF2F23F06