Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-15 08:01:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 309D11A77C5E2D505D1DBC04AFAE3A929F6ACAB2EBA702D2A999D58D4CA2F5E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The outcome was not in anyway determined by public opinion or social media. It was a civil case in a US court w/ the verdict reached unanimously by a jury, which found Heard liable for deformation with actual malice. That verdict is recorded & stands, regardless of social media.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691259869179813984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 309D11A77C5E2D505D1DBC04AFAE3A929F6ACAB2EBA702D2A999D58D4CA2F5E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1692086517789
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691259869179813984309D11A77C5E2D505D1DBC04AFAE3A929F6ACAB2EBA702D2A999D58D4CA2F5E2