Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-15 23:06:12 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFAFF4FD807FF0AF92E6D25C532921E6101947377C3ADB69D3FD1EF08327F421
Participant Details

Original Note:

These are accusations submitted to a Grand Jury for review, not a formal indictment. While the submission comprises evidence & arguments from prosecutors, an indictment is the jury's formal decision. It suggests there's ample evidence for trial. https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/indicted-vs-charged/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691229625874362400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFAFF4FD807FF0AF92E6D25C532921E6101947377C3ADB69D3FD1EF08327F421
  • createdAtMillis - 1692140772764
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691229625874362400CFAFF4FD807FF0AF92E6D25C532921E6101947377C3ADB69D3FD1EF08327F421