Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-15 15:53:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AE27BADC24EF32A135E9A9AC011497E10E4E2F2F25569356DFE035B7F0D5EFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Depp v Heard defamation trial and outcome is cited in the article mentioned in the post. Jezebel's supporting citations: https://jezebel.com/depp-v-heard-netflix-review-1850701333?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter https://jezebel.com/jury-rules-in-favor-of-johnny-depp-concludes-amber-hea-1849003135

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691191005276516550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1AE27BADC24EF32A135E9A9AC011497E10E4E2F2F25569356DFE035B7F0D5EFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1692114797895
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16911910052765165501AE27BADC24EF32A135E9A9AC011497E10E4E2F2F25569356DFE035B7F0D5EFC