Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-14 21:24:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64AA034F9A044C1E3789A1EA8D0F02F8B8D4D235D3438A7E661DDC06273A2F58
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is Misleading. It compares a large area of light polluted sky, with a much smaller zoomed-in image of a dense star field taken via long exposure and telescope. The sky without light poll. would look nothing like this second image to eye. A correct comparison here, https://www.jmu.edu/planetarium/light-pollution.shtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691162303423480100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64AA034F9A044C1E3789A1EA8D0F02F8B8D4D235D3438A7E661DDC06273A2F58
  • createdAtMillis - 1692048279818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169116230342348010064AA034F9A044C1E3789A1EA8D0F02F8B8D4D235D3438A7E661DDC06273A2F58