Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 07:07:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2CB81EC0CBB7D816B44D0F758A076356FDEB5F28A363008824B525C36AEB354B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article explicitly states "I do not remember exactly how long this psychological-sexological evaluation lasted. I remember only that it was a process lasting several months, not a single consultation." It was not "one meeting".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690942081710063945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2CB81EC0CBB7D816B44D0F758A076356FDEB5F28A363008824B525C36AEB354B
  • createdAtMillis - 1692428850660
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16909420817100639452CB81EC0CBB7D816B44D0F758A076356FDEB5F28A363008824B525C36AEB354B