Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-25 11:11:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D036864BDC1D17A38BBDC23E97D9831E7788C3642ABD23327CA6E91B4482A904
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wirtschafts-und Strafrecht zeigen, dass es gar nicht so einfach ist, darüber zu urteilen, ob es eine Vorteilsnahme gab. Deswegen sind solche Äußerungen persönliche Meinungen, ohne kundigen Sachverstand des Rechts https://www.wirtschaftsstrafrecht-strafverteidiger.de/vorteilsannahme-331-stgb/ https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/1/01/1-541-01.php3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1690779140822118587
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D036864BDC1D17A38BBDC23E97D9831E7788C3642ABD23327CA6E91B4482A904
createdAtMillis - 1703502706513
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1690779140822118587D036864BDC1D17A38BBDC23E97D9831E7788C3642ABD23327CA6E91B4482A904