Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-13 21:34:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source citée dans la note ne permet pas d'affirmer que cette étude est "controversée", du moins certainement pas chez les chercheurs et chercheuses. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690735175561310696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672
  • createdAtMillis - 1691962455187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1690735175561310696E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672