Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-13 14:49:55 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3992E430898C0CD5E27E99761271E3A81DC9ACB3350F2CCB30D81404BEB9C09
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source citée dans la note ne permet pas d'affirmer que cette étude est "controversée", du moins certainement pas chez les chercheurs et chercheuses. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690735175561310696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3992E430898C0CD5E27E99761271E3A81DC9ACB3350F2CCB30D81404BEB9C09
  • createdAtMillis - 1691938195509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1690735175561310696C3992E430898C0CD5E27E99761271E3A81DC9ACB3350F2CCB30D81404BEB9C09