Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-15 11:21:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8D00119CCC5169F3ACFA92910BD495AD86E44C387302A8F293D300089E57E298
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source citée dans la note ne permet pas d'affirmer que cette étude est "controversée", du moins certainement pas chez les chercheurs et chercheuses. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690735175561310696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8D00119CCC5169F3ACFA92910BD495AD86E44C387302A8F293D300089E57E298
  • createdAtMillis - 1692098490110
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16907351755613106968D00119CCC5169F3ACFA92910BD495AD86E44C387302A8F293D300089E57E298