Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-13 16:01:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 885746DFE3BB34258CD365F02B1A6FFC06E8958079885FBADC4DA572D1174154
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source citée dans la note ne permet pas d'affirmer que cette étude est "controversée", du moins certainement pas chez les chercheurs et chercheuses. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690735175561310696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 885746DFE3BB34258CD365F02B1A6FFC06E8958079885FBADC4DA572D1174154
  • createdAtMillis - 1691942471962
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1690735175561310696885746DFE3BB34258CD365F02B1A6FFC06E8958079885FBADC4DA572D1174154