Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-15 08:55:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0797267785F3C41D058A41B2763EFCC2829D7610D5D927D2ACEE31D5EEBAA5DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source citée dans la note ne permet pas d'affirmer que cette étude est "controversée", du moins certainement pas chez les chercheurs et chercheuses. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690735175561310696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0797267785F3C41D058A41B2763EFCC2829D7610D5D927D2ACEE31D5EEBAA5DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1692089755494
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16907351755613106960797267785F3C41D058A41B2763EFCC2829D7610D5D927D2ACEE31D5EEBAA5DB