Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 11:21:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3554BDA3345D93FAB429D6602C175F882C327CE186E96A5184F5BD28FC59A7CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該ツイートに関しては、避妊具の重要性ではなく「公金の使い方」の問題提起を目的としています。 また、このツイートによって避妊具の有用性が否定されることも考えにくいため、コミュニティノートは不要であると考えられます。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690251388696350856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3554BDA3345D93FAB429D6602C175F882C327CE186E96A5184F5BD28FC59A7CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1691839294649
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16902513886963508563554BDA3345D93FAB429D6602C175F882C327CE186E96A5184F5BD28FC59A7CA