Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 10:10:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8D81B8FE5582FFD873335F962FE451D652625871A1597645B76CE1523D0DEB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Judge’s ruling was to Limit the Defendant from discussing evidence related to his election interference case with anyone outside the court room, outside of that his Freedom of Speech is in tact. https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-hearing-arguments-proposed-protective-order-trumps-jan/story?id=102197791 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-judge-says-trumps-right-to-free-speech-is-not-absolute-in-election-case https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/08/11/protective-order-hearing-trump-jan-6-evidence/https://www.axios.com/2023/08/11/chutkan-trump-free-speech-2020-election

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690208318453870988
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8D81B8FE5582FFD873335F962FE451D652625871A1597645B76CE1523D0DEB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1691835001001
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1690208318453870988C8D81B8FE5582FFD873335F962FE451D652625871A1597645B76CE1523D0DEB3