Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 17:40:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Judge’s ruling was to Limit the Defendant from discussing evidence related to his election interference case with anyone outside the court room, outside of that his Freedom of Speech is in tact. https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-hearing-arguments-proposed-protective-order-trumps-jan/story?id=102197791 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-judge-says-trumps-right-to-free-speech-is-not-absolute-in-election-case https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/08/11/protective-order-hearing-trump-jan-6-evidence/https://www.axios.com/2023/08/11/chutkan-trump-free-speech-2020-election

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690208318453870988
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
  • createdAtMillis - 1691862023265
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1690208318453870988C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9