Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 10:18:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90F0A193FD5443D47A6BC9D5D01569E4E2A29EB98610B1036062D75BCF5B1C70
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Judge’s ruling was to Limit the Defendant from discussing evidence related to his election interference case with anyone outside the court room, outside of that his Freedom of Speech is in tact. https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-hearing-arguments-proposed-protective-order-trumps-jan/story?id=102197791 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-judge-says-trumps-right-to-free-speech-is-not-absolute-in-election-case https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/08/11/protective-order-hearing-trump-jan-6-evidence/https://www.axios.com/2023/08/11/chutkan-trump-free-speech-2020-election

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690208318453870988
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90F0A193FD5443D47A6BC9D5D01569E4E2A29EB98610B1036062D75BCF5B1C70
  • createdAtMillis - 1691835504108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 169020831845387098890F0A193FD5443D47A6BC9D5D01569E4E2A29EB98610B1036062D75BCF5B1C70