Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 09:52:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78B8020C299ED270762B0BC07179AEC23E1855272F2D2A337C123F30BD9A4BE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Judge’s ruling was to Limit the Defendant from discussing evidence related to his election interference case with anyone outside the court room, outside of that his Freedom of Speech is in tact. https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-hearing-arguments-proposed-protective-order-trumps-jan/story?id=102197791 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-judge-says-trumps-right-to-free-speech-is-not-absolute-in-election-case https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/08/11/protective-order-hearing-trump-jan-6-evidence/https://www.axios.com/2023/08/11/chutkan-trump-free-speech-2020-election

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690208318453870988
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78B8020C299ED270762B0BC07179AEC23E1855272F2D2A337C123F30BD9A4BE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1691833928489
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169020831845387098878B8020C299ED270762B0BC07179AEC23E1855272F2D2A337C123F30BD9A4BE5