Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 04:02:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A56E1695DEEA453796118D303946F8ABFAF053E6A68D977F33E9228DED9F3DCC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN Les attendus de la décision du Conseil d'État portent suffisamment sur le fond du dossier pour pouvoir prévoir que cette suspension précède l'annulation. La formulation de Sophie Binet est donc un raccourci mais n'est pas une Fake news qui justifierait une note corrective.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690121963493052886
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A56E1695DEEA453796118D303946F8ABFAF053E6A68D977F33E9228DED9F3DCC
  • createdAtMillis - 1691812949251
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1690121963493052886A56E1695DEEA453796118D303946F8ABFAF053E6A68D977F33E9228DED9F3DCC