Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 18:23:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A45C29D78F189FE2FF3B2343D8C1F5E4A025CB8FA3306640BAA2FC22CE20C73F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN Les attendus de la décision du Conseil d'État portent suffisamment sur le fond du dossier pour pouvoir prévoir que cette suspension précède l'annulation. La formulation de Sophie Binet est donc un raccourci mais n'est pas une Fake news qui justifierait une note corrective.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690121963493052886
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A45C29D78F189FE2FF3B2343D8C1F5E4A025CB8FA3306640BAA2FC22CE20C73F
  • createdAtMillis - 1691864632621
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1690121963493052886A45C29D78F189FE2FF3B2343D8C1F5E4A025CB8FA3306640BAA2FC22CE20C73F