Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 10:04:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69396FE3A0B542256B8D0B9F1002E9D51C781225557792CC913B0CC01E2F7082
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN Les attendus de la décision du Conseil d'État portent suffisamment sur le fond du dossier pour pouvoir prévoir que cette suspension précède l'annulation. La formulation de Sophie Binet est donc un raccourci mais n'est pas une Fake news qui justifierait une note corrective.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690121963493052886
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69396FE3A0B542256B8D0B9F1002E9D51C781225557792CC913B0CC01E2F7082
  • createdAtMillis - 1691834648828
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169012196349305288669396FE3A0B542256B8D0B9F1002E9D51C781225557792CC913B0CC01E2F7082