Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 04:06:49 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6728AB42DF9ECC07087CBBF6D0A84DA94A9758F639D075B3DD9C6FC6A79C79ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN Les attendus de la décision du Conseil d'État portent suffisamment sur le fond du dossier pour pouvoir prévoir que cette suspension précède l'annulation. La formulation de Sophie Binet est donc un raccourci mais n'est pas une Fake news qui justifierait une note corrective.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690121963493052886
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6728AB42DF9ECC07087CBBF6D0A84DA94A9758F639D075B3DD9C6FC6A79C79ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1691813209570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16901219634930528866728AB42DF9ECC07087CBBF6D0A84DA94A9758F639D075B3DD9C6FC6A79C79ED