Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-11 13:58:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community notes takes aim to any post (even platform approved ads) published in this platform that may be considered disinformation/misinformation Even within the community notes ,system contributors are rated by their comments, making it more resilient to manipulation. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1689937939449421964
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C
createdAtMillis - 1691762292744
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16899379394494219641B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C