Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-11 15:49:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5388286E19470E942A8CBF48A122446DA8856B7A88259D7C24E4A79EC23F3564
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post ignores the low estimate/range (2%- 19%) in favor of the highest estimate (19%). The post also ignores that only four West African populations were examined. Also ignored is that the article mentions similar ‘analogous patterns’ in Han Chinese and Europeans from Utah. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax5097

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689831362864263613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5388286E19470E942A8CBF48A122446DA8856B7A88259D7C24E4A79EC23F3564
  • createdAtMillis - 1691768960026
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16898313628642636135388286E19470E942A8CBF48A122446DA8856B7A88259D7C24E4A79EC23F3564