Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 10:37:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBECE6B7B1E9F764C1F3EFC96664FAD0D1888797C8A8DB05958179094A4C66EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

From the article linked to in the post: "The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a lower court judge’s $350,000 contempt sanction on the social media company for failing to comply with the warrant until after a three-day deadline." https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/09/special-counsel-got-search-warrant-for-trump-twitter-account.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689579196832481432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBECE6B7B1E9F764C1F3EFC96664FAD0D1888797C8A8DB05958179094A4C66EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1691663831461
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689579196832481432EBECE6B7B1E9F764C1F3EFC96664FAD0D1888797C8A8DB05958179094A4C66EC