Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 19:08:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1031B0C19B4AFC524B91BDD45980F4F8D4E1E663F49A2489215981CD20A5A5FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

From the article linked to in the post: "The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a lower court judge’s $350,000 contempt sanction on the social media company for failing to comply with the warrant until after a three-day deadline." https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/09/special-counsel-got-search-warrant-for-trump-twitter-account.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689579196832481432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1031B0C19B4AFC524B91BDD45980F4F8D4E1E663F49A2489215981CD20A5A5FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1691694539813
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16895791968324814321031B0C19B4AFC524B91BDD45980F4F8D4E1E663F49A2489215981CD20A5A5FD