Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-11 14:03:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB903A32B93022A3B7FFF53DA059BC7905AB035D22199FA1F71BE9A6F1E3BB80
Participant Details

Original Note:

Non ci sono prove dell'esistenza di quelle che l'autore del post lascia intendere siano "scie chimiche". È semplice condensa prodotta dagli aerei in volo https://www.arpa.veneto.it/temi-ambientali/aria/file-e-allegati/documenti/altri-documenti/relazione-scie-chimiche.pdf/@@download/file

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689557184001016297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB903A32B93022A3B7FFF53DA059BC7905AB035D22199FA1F71BE9A6F1E3BB80
  • createdAtMillis - 1691762633071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689557184001016297DB903A32B93022A3B7FFF53DA059BC7905AB035D22199FA1F71BE9A6F1E3BB80