Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 09:16:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C724056FEA0C2245DC94ACB67B952CB94AB763F5875C7C1D19C6A7F3DCEE907
Participant Details

Original Note:

Non ci sono prove dell'esistenza di quelle che l'autore del post lascia intendere siano "scie chimiche". È semplice condensa prodotta dagli aerei in volo https://www.arpa.veneto.it/temi-ambientali/aria/file-e-allegati/documenti/altri-documenti/relazione-scie-chimiche.pdf/@@download/file

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689557184001016297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C724056FEA0C2245DC94ACB67B952CB94AB763F5875C7C1D19C6A7F3DCEE907
  • createdAtMillis - 1691659008387
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16895571840010162974C724056FEA0C2245DC94ACB67B952CB94AB763F5875C7C1D19C6A7F3DCEE907