Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-13 08:11:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49346835E60F7E0D3C31B977A114D3934D0F02DFC218C3B97FDA29FFCFEDF3C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Non ci sono prove dell'esistenza di quelle che l'autore del post lascia intendere siano "scie chimiche". È semplice condensa prodotta dagli aerei in volo https://www.arpa.veneto.it/temi-ambientali/aria/file-e-allegati/documenti/altri-documenti/relazione-scie-chimiche.pdf/@@download/file

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689557184001016297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49346835E60F7E0D3C31B977A114D3934D0F02DFC218C3B97FDA29FFCFEDF3C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1691914269223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168955718400101629749346835E60F7E0D3C31B977A114D3934D0F02DFC218C3B97FDA29FFCFEDF3C7