Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 23:44:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1260CC43B1DD8637A61B4D93C384F5626885729F441AD123327F80C74F08EE1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Non ci sono prove dell'esistenza di quelle che l'autore del post lascia intendere siano "scie chimiche". È semplice condensa prodotta dagli aerei in volo https://www.arpa.veneto.it/temi-ambientali/aria/file-e-allegati/documenti/altri-documenti/relazione-scie-chimiche.pdf/@@download/file

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689557184001016297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1260CC43B1DD8637A61B4D93C384F5626885729F441AD123327F80C74F08EE1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1691711062136
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16895571840010162971260CC43B1DD8637A61B4D93C384F5626885729F441AD123327F80C74F08EE1E