Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 04:16:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33FB6247EB3F2D340754A6C818F28C9CB2451092D0CEF79EA996BF128FD995B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter objected to producing any information 4 days after the 1st deadline (pg 4), did not object to an opportunity of purging its contempt by meeting a new deadline, with sanctions if they didn’t (pg 8), but missed that deadline as well (pg 9). The claims are factual. NNN. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23903693/redactedopinion.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689483302078660748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33FB6247EB3F2D340754A6C818F28C9CB2451092D0CEF79EA996BF128FD995B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1691640986614
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168948330207866074833FB6247EB3F2D340754A6C818F28C9CB2451092D0CEF79EA996BF128FD995B5