Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-11 11:42:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 988F7A9B1774D9BD141F1DD667F0DEC2D502B700D8859C05DB9CC6B4A6A680A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misleading tweet. Twitter complied with the search warrant, they were just late in doing so and tried to object to the hush order accompanying the search warrant. The opinion of the Court of Appeals that explains what happened is here: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23903693/redactedopinion.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689471868623863992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 988F7A9B1774D9BD141F1DD667F0DEC2D502B700D8859C05DB9CC6B4A6A680A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1691754144694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1689471868623863992988F7A9B1774D9BD141F1DD667F0DEC2D502B700D8859C05DB9CC6B4A6A680A7