Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 06:19:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misleading tweet. Twitter complied with the search warrant, they were just late in doing so and tried to object to the hush order accompanying the search warrant. The opinion of the Court of Appeals that explains what happened is here: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23903693/redactedopinion.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689471868623863992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857
  • createdAtMillis - 1691648362197
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16894718686238639922535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857