Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 19:09:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1031B0C19B4AFC524B91BDD45980F4F8D4E1E663F49A2489215981CD20A5A5FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misleading tweet. Twitter complied with the search warrant, they were just late in doing so and tried to object to the hush order accompanying the search warrant. The opinion of the Court of Appeals that explains what happened is here: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23903693/redactedopinion.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689471868623863992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1031B0C19B4AFC524B91BDD45980F4F8D4E1E663F49A2489215981CD20A5A5FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1691694557725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16894718686238639921031B0C19B4AFC524B91BDD45980F4F8D4E1E663F49A2489215981CD20A5A5FD