Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 15:27:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EDD2FC5E72BFB7E53B3D80485025F2C153CFB21A1AE826FC873EA56506FCC852
Participant Details

Original Note:

Google might have taken actions since, as it has already been the case many times in the past when users are targeting establishments with fake reviews. Information was correct at the time it was posted, but might be out of date now, and therefore, this does not require a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689434634826699039
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EDD2FC5E72BFB7E53B3D80485025F2C153CFB21A1AE826FC873EA56506FCC852
  • createdAtMillis - 1691681279783
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689434634826699039EDD2FC5E72BFB7E53B3D80485025F2C153CFB21A1AE826FC873EA56506FCC852