Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 03:56:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32E1D60177F81CCC13EAB61A61EAEC2AC5EF688C4B61A0B2238348A660BB8192
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet implies this was a ruling of the Supreme Court. It was not. The decision occurred on the shadow docket and did not contain the opinion of the single Justice that issued it, Elena Kagan. Apple has announced it intends to pursue a full Supreme Court appeal. https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-refuses-epic-bid-let-app-store-order-take-effect-apple-case-2023-08-09/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689371022686884082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32E1D60177F81CCC13EAB61A61EAEC2AC5EF688C4B61A0B2238348A660BB8192
  • createdAtMillis - 1691639818629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168937102268688408232E1D60177F81CCC13EAB61A61EAEC2AC5EF688C4B61A0B2238348A660BB8192