Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 23:13:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AFB8E083D5BC583AB2F2E3D8DEBB9E63F86EE489478ACFD3E9396F629A9DA41
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet implies this was a ruling of the Supreme Court. It was not. The decision occurred on the shadow docket and did not contain the opinion of the single Justice that issued it, Elena Kagan. Apple has announced it intends to pursue a full Supreme Court appeal. https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-refuses-epic-bid-let-app-store-order-take-effect-apple-case-2023-08-09/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689371022686884082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1AFB8E083D5BC583AB2F2E3D8DEBB9E63F86EE489478ACFD3E9396F629A9DA41
  • createdAtMillis - 1691622788695
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16893710226868840821AFB8E083D5BC583AB2F2E3D8DEBB9E63F86EE489478ACFD3E9396F629A9DA41