Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 18:21:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D2C6FEEC31F44F8848F30B5F9B96B09B8CECA5715AFFCEFCD31D4E3139C9E2C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supreme court ruled in favor of Apple regarding a temporary injunction that would have halt Apple's ability to take a 30% share. Apple still needs to file a supreme court appeal regarding the original 9th circuit ruling and judges need to agree to hear the case. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/apple-can-keep-app-store-rules-for-now-as-top-court-spurns-epic

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689339335014035602
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D2C6FEEC31F44F8848F30B5F9B96B09B8CECA5715AFFCEFCD31D4E3139C9E2C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1691605295147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689339335014035602D2C6FEEC31F44F8848F30B5F9B96B09B8CECA5715AFFCEFCD31D4E3139C9E2C8