Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 11:51:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E841B28B82989C465D46357252C1CF7F7EB9139A887C16C30780209FD24EE24B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il s’agit d’une mauvaise interprétation de l’étude et diffusée dans certains médias à sensations , dont on parle de l’écoanxiété . Il n’a quasiment pas de risque de rupture du Gulf Stream à moyen terme. Voici l’article source de Philippot ; https://theconversation.com/le-gulf-stream-ne-seffondrera-pas-en-2025-voici-comment-le-sensationnalisme-naide-pas-la-science-ni-le-climat-211077 Enfin, voici l’étude originale : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39810-w?utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=commission_junction&utm_campaign=CONR_PF018_ECOM_GL_PHSS_ALWYS_DEEPLINK&utm_content=textlink&utm_term=PID100052171&CJEVENT=a27c448731ec11ee8101ce010a18b8fa

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689227476130553906
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E841B28B82989C465D46357252C1CF7F7EB9139A887C16C30780209FD24EE24B
  • createdAtMillis - 1691581864642
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689227476130553906E841B28B82989C465D46357252C1CF7F7EB9139A887C16C30780209FD24EE24B