Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 11:50:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBB43D1CEA5DC0F6274B71D1F213634116B5AC19F76E6B8BA73D1D6AE3FFE1E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article title is factual, although it outdated news and missing detail on SB 145 that a quick web search would obtain. Argument for or against the tweet should be taken to the comments. https://www.abc10.com/article/news/politics/newsom-controversial-sb-145-new-law/103-238a7155-93a3-4f30-9daf-5d277d7ac91e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689141879856881910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBB43D1CEA5DC0F6274B71D1F213634116B5AC19F76E6B8BA73D1D6AE3FFE1E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1691581818080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689141879856881910EBB43D1CEA5DC0F6274B71D1F213634116B5AC19F76E6B8BA73D1D6AE3FFE1E1