Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 04:55:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author is making the case that the supreme court’s decisions are not in keeping with the actual wording in the second amendment. The fact that those Supreme Court decisions exist does not refute the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689082410321797310
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60
  • createdAtMillis - 1691556953171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689082410321797310ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60