Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 01:17:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD2DB85BDA07BCF52C7FBCE7EFBCFAAD8581AA6E638238D5546A109842FE4B37
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author is making the case that the supreme court’s decisions are not in keeping with the actual wording in the second amendment. The fact that those Supreme Court decisions exist does not refute the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689082410321797310
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AD2DB85BDA07BCF52C7FBCE7EFBCFAAD8581AA6E638238D5546A109842FE4B37
  • createdAtMillis - 1691543869087
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689082410321797310AD2DB85BDA07BCF52C7FBCE7EFBCFAAD8581AA6E638238D5546A109842FE4B37