Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 14:46:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64690BC015352B0A68E70A2B750F6447D95DDD5FEEEA525CE4161BCE1E5E6DDC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The case referred to in another note did not examine any evidence. This tweet does not need a note added to it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688985040108085752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64690BC015352B0A68E70A2B750F6447D95DDD5FEEEA525CE4161BCE1E5E6DDC
  • createdAtMillis - 1691592384524
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168898504010808575264690BC015352B0A68E70A2B750F6447D95DDD5FEEEA525CE4161BCE1E5E6DDC