Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-09 05:44:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6563814E597CA592E1E0710F8CD0105AC342EEBEAE765B29CA8F6EEEDFB6361
Participant Details

Original Note:

写真からは悪質な事実誤認となるような要素はなく、加工された風景写真があるのみです ポストされた内容が事象の背景情報と大きく乖離した場合につけるべきです 車両が炎上している写真の例がわかりやすいでしょう https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/ja/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688970905639436747
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6563814E597CA592E1E0710F8CD0105AC342EEBEAE765B29CA8F6EEEDFB6361
  • createdAtMillis - 1691559850105
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1688970905639436747C6563814E597CA592E1E0710F8CD0105AC342EEBEAE765B29CA8F6EEEDFB6361