Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 18:00:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE595D7DC4124AC4168467809E44E56E02F7238AE280189FC8918435AE47F45F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Of course there had to be an investigation prior to claiming there was no fraud. There was no proven case of voting fraud yet. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-courts-election-idUSKBN2AF1G1 https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/17/fact-check-2020-election-whats-true-and-whats-false/6266732002/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688965619230662792
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE595D7DC4124AC4168467809E44E56E02F7238AE280189FC8918435AE47F45F
  • createdAtMillis - 1691517609254
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1688965619230662792CE595D7DC4124AC4168467809E44E56E02F7238AE280189FC8918435AE47F45F