Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 21:00:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 608FFB1639F2548767AAE1A99A235BAA0C47D10360469076C4E80C5FC4410A0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Current note makes no mention of police report or case and is a pretty general statement regarding irregularities as handled by the clerk. Those that are suspected (how obvious) are not fulfilled. Better source would be the police report itself: https://archive.org/details/msp-foia-1-of-2/page/n3/mode/2up?view=theater

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1688950114726109658
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 608FFB1639F2548767AAE1A99A235BAA0C47D10360469076C4E80C5FC4410A0D
createdAtMillis - 1691874018715
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1688950114726109658608FFB1639F2548767AAE1A99A235BAA0C47D10360469076C4E80C5FC4410A0D