Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 21:49:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF6F9B7E705B1477F163FD59579FB381E1722E8645BE50A49233B613D45C01D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The existence of a potential quid pro quo does not automatically imply that the exchange was illegal. "A quid pro quo is only illegal if it breaks the law, as in the case of a bribe, blackmail, or some sort of contingency". https://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quidproquo.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688895696131244482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF6F9B7E705B1477F163FD59579FB381E1722E8645BE50A49233B613D45C01D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1691531347010
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1688895696131244482BF6F9B7E705B1477F163FD59579FB381E1722E8645BE50A49233B613D45C01D6