Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 13:02:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A89AFEDC85F8FF062FB5E44AD3373DF9BEA2775BD03455C714BE5ED05B09F9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The existence of a potential quid pro quo does not automatically imply that the exchange was illegal. "A quid pro quo is only illegal if it breaks the law, as in the case of a bribe, blackmail, or some sort of contingency". https://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quidproquo.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688895696131244482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A89AFEDC85F8FF062FB5E44AD3373DF9BEA2775BD03455C714BE5ED05B09F9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1691499737472
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16888956961312444825A89AFEDC85F8FF062FB5E44AD3373DF9BEA2775BD03455C714BE5ED05B09F9A