Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-08 09:34:11 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB1AE43E912D1737E5C97C461BA07A005ADE010F4D575C74893B1FCEAAAAA58D
Participant Details

Original Note:

While it was never 100% confirmed, it has been debunked that this is not Sunak. Missing facial properties and an rather weaker alibi strengthen the fact that it was not him. https://youtu.be/gnmFY6uII9M

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688798228492239042
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB1AE43E912D1737E5C97C461BA07A005ADE010F4D575C74893B1FCEAAAAA58D
  • createdAtMillis - 1691487251387
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1688798228492239042AB1AE43E912D1737E5C97C461BA07A005ADE010F4D575C74893B1FCEAAAAA58D